Ford Puma Titanium
Crossover · Gasoline
vs
Hyundai Kona Hybrid
Crossover · Hybrid
Ford Puma Titanium
Car A
Ford Puma Titanium
Practical and easy to live with for growing families, the Ford Puma Titanium pairs five-seat flexibility with a roomy 456 L boot and brisk everyday pace. At 28,000, it offers good value in its segment for city-focused commuting and weekend duties.
5 seatsCrossoverGasoline5-star safety155 hp
Hyundai Kona Hybrid
Car B
Hyundai Kona Hybrid
The Hyundai Kona Hybrid emphasizes low running costs and everyday practicality for city commutes and small families. It trades outright speed and cargo space for efficiency and a solid safety standing in its class.
5 seatsCrossoverHybrid5-star safety5.1 L/100kmHybrid
Why compared better on fuelbetter valuecomparison picksame body typesame seatssimilar price

Usage fit

Family 70 / 67
City 69 / 70
Budget / value 70 / 71
Road trip 40 / 46
Performance 25 / 28
Cargo 32 / 27
Practical 55 / 53
Premium 17 / 16
Winter 28 / 28

Scores out of 100. Blue = Ford Puma Titanium · Orange = Hyundai Kona Hybrid

Specs side-by-side

Spec Ford Puma Titanium Hyundai Kona Hybrid
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Ford Puma Titanium

  • Efficient for its class at 5.2 L/100 km, easing fuel costs
  • 456 L cargo space suits strollers, sports gear, and weekend bags
  • Brisk 0–100 km/h in 8.0 s helps with urban merges and overtakes
  • Safety and reliability are highlighted strengths in its positioning

Hyundai Kona Hybrid

  • Efficient for its class at 5.1 L/100 km.
  • Good value in its segment around 25,000.
  • Smooth city drivability from 265 Nm and 9.9 s 0–100 km/h.
  • Small-family practicality: 5 seats, 361 liters of trunk space.

Verdict

Pick Ford Puma Titanium if…
Efficiency & everyday ease
Ford Puma Titanium is the choice if fuel economy and city-friendly driving are your priority.
Pick Hyundai Kona Hybrid if…
Performance & capability
Hyundai Kona Hybrid is the choice if you want more power, speed, or all-weather capability.

Related comparisons