Hyundai Kona N
Crossover · Gasoline
vs
Honda CR-V Touring
Crossover · Gasoline
Hyundai Kona N
Car A
Hyundai Kona N
The Hyundai Kona N blends quick acceleration with the everyday usefulness of a five-seat compact. Strong reliability and safety signals support good value in its segment, though efficiency and cargo space are only middling.
5 seatsCrossoverGasoline5-star safety280 hp
Honda CR-V Touring
Car B
Honda CR-V Touring
The Honda CR-V Touring emphasizes family practicality and dependable daily use at a price that reads as good value in its segment. Big cargo space plus strong reliability and safety signals suit growing families who need room without excess frills.
5 seatsCrossoverGasoline5-star safety8.1 L/100km
Why compared more reliablebetter valuecomparison picksame body typesame powertrainsame seats

Usage fit

Family 67 / 86
City 50 / 51
Budget / value 62 / 65
Road trip 48 / 63
Performance 29 / 26
Cargo 27 / 64
Practical 49 / 64
Premium 27 / 25
Winter 34 / 34

Scores out of 100. Blue = Hyundai Kona N · Orange = Honda CR-V Touring

Specs side-by-side

Spec Hyundai Kona N Honda CR-V Touring
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Hyundai Kona N

  • Quick 0–100 km/h in 5.5 s and 280 hp make merging and passing easy
  • Five seats and a 361‑liter trunk suit everyday family‑compact errands
  • Strong reliability and safety signals support low‑stress ownership
  • At 34,900, it reads as good value in its segment for performance‑minded shoppers

Honda CR-V Touring

  • Expansive 1014 L cargo area for strollers, sports gear, and luggage
  • Strong reliability and safety signals for low-stress family duty
  • Responsive acceleration (0–100 km/h in 7.5 s) for confident merging
  • At $33,500, represents good value in its segment

Verdict

Pick Hyundai Kona N if…
Efficiency & everyday ease
Hyundai Kona N is the choice if fuel economy and city-friendly driving are your priority.
Pick Honda CR-V Touring if…
Reliability edge
Honda CR-V Touring scores higher on reliability — worth considering for long-term ownership.

Related comparisons